#Most g force survived driver#
Mass driver development has been pursued by a dedicated group, first at two NASA Ames summer studies in 19, and during the intervening academic year, while O’Neill was a visiting professor at MIT. The mass driver on display at the Princeton Conference in 1979. Note that ANFO may not be the quick triggering explosive you need for the above technology illustrative only. Particularly when the thing goes supersonic. I am guessing ear protection might be a good idea. The amount of explosives used can be very large and stacked in rings each conceivably as high yielding as the picture below for a conventional Wang Bullet kind of explosive launch of the kind Paul 451 suggested.
#Most g force survived series#
Projectiles are accelerated by a series of hollow explosive rings that are detonated in rapid sequence causing a near-constant pressure to form at the base of the projectile, thereby generating a near-constant and large acceleration * it has affordability, ferocity, and quick reaction time
* it possesses excellent stealth (i.e., it has no exhaust plume) It has artillery-like operations, complexity and cost Russian experiments indicate that Mach 27 projectile/payload velocity is achievable.Longer barrel generates lower launch acceleration.40 m barrel generates 100,000 g acceleration.15 m barrel generates 300,000 g acceleration.Estimated launch cost: $200 – 2,000/kg of payload, depending on construction and refurbishment options.* is a concept that has been verified by NASA studies “It is quite clear from the transmission and the transcript that at no point during the period leading up to Jules’ accident did the team urge Jules to drive faster or make any comments suggesting that he should do so.And indeed that is one scenario we consider in the article.īrian Wang’s coverage of explosive launch
#Most g force survived full#
“Regarding point 2, an audio copy of the full radio transmission between Jules and the team, and a written transcript, were provided to the FIA. That is an irrefutable fact, as proven by the telemetry data, which the team has provided to the FIA. “Regarding point 1, Jules did slow down under the double waved yellow flags.
“However, given that these allegations are entirely false, the team has no alternative but to address these.
“At a time when its driver is critically ill in hospital, and the team has made clear that its highest priority is consideration for Jules and his family, it is distressing to have to respond to deeply upsetting rumours and inaccuracies in respect of the circumstances of Jules’ accident. “The Marussia F1 team is shocked and angered by these allegations,” Marussia said in a statement. Marussia has angrily responded to allegations Bianchi and his team ignored instructions to slow down before the crash. His car went off at Turn 7, where Sauber driver Adrian Sutil had crashed two laps earlier.Īccording to a report issued by Formula 1’s governing body the FIA, Bianchi lost control of his car, travelled across the run-off area and hit the back of the tractor that was being used to remove Sutil’s car. Team Marussia driver Bianchi crashed on the 44th lap of a rain-shortened race at the Suzuka circuit on October 5. We have no certainties, we just have to wait.” “But who knows when that will happen - if it will happen. “When Jules gets a bit better we can transfer him, maybe to Tokyo and things will be a bit easier.
0 kommentar(er)
